1. Purpose
The Scoring Framework establishes the universal structural elements that apply to all scoring types within the RSS. It defines the foundational architecture of scoring, ensuring consistency, transparency, and integrity across all assurance activities conducted under Layer 6.
2. Scope
This framework applies to all scoring activities conducted under the RSS, including:
- People Scoring (6.2)
- Role Scoring (6.3)
- Domain Scoring (6.4)
- Composite Scoring (6.5)
It is universally applicable across all individuals, roles, institutions, and domains subject to righteousness evaluation.
3. Normative References
The following documents are indispensable for the application of this framework:
- RSS 37001:2026 – Fundamentals Standard (Layer 1)
- RSS 37002:2026 – Foundation Standard (Layer 2)
- RSS 37003:2026 – Alignment Standard (Layer 3)
- RSS 37006:2026 – Assurance Standard (Layer 6, Main Catalog)
All scoring inputs, criteria, scales, verification rules, and integrity requirements defined in this framework shall be interpreted in a manner fully consistent with the axioms, foundational components, and alignment principles established in Layers 1 through 3.
4. Core Content
The Scoring Framework consists of five normative sub-components:
4.1 Scoring Inputs
Scoring inputs constitute the evidentiary basis for all righteousness scores. They shall include, but are not limited to:
- Self-assessments – conducted by the individual or institution under evaluation.
- Peer and stakeholder assessments – evaluations by colleagues, community members, or other relevant parties.
- Institutional records – performance data, policies, procedures, and governance documentation.
- Independent audit findings – third-party verification of righteousness claims and practices.
- Corrective action records – documentation of past failures and restoration efforts.
- Process evidence – records demonstrating adherence to Layer 5 process standards.
All inputs shall be documented, verifiable, and maintained in a manner consistent with the transparency requirements established in Layer 3.
4.2 Scoring Criteria
Scoring criteria are the specific standards against which scoring inputs are evaluated. They are derived directly from the normative content of Layers 1 through 3:
| Source | Contribution |
|---|---|
| Layer 1 – Axioms | Defines the foundational truths of righteousness (Axioms 1–4). |
| Layer 2 – Foundational Components | Defines moral intent, ethical awareness, value consistency, responsibility ownership, and commitment to truthfulness. |
| Layer 2 – Foundational Domains | Defines the universal domains (personal conduct, institutional conduct, relational justice, social responsibility, corrective action). |
| Layer 3 – Alignment Principles | Defines consistency with axioms, coherence across domains, integrity of intent and action, mutual alignment, and transparency. |
| Layer 3 – Alignment Requirements | Defines value alignment, behavioral alignment, structural alignment, relational alignment, and corrective alignment. |
All criteria shall be:
- Explicit – clearly articulated and unambiguous.
- Measurable – amenable to quantitative or qualitative assessment.
- Consistent – applied uniformly across all comparable scoring contexts.
- Transparent – publicly accessible and subject to review.
4.3 Scoring Scales
Scoring scales provide the measurement framework for assigning values to righteousness performance. The RSS employs a multi-tiered scale system, including:
| Scale Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Binary indicators | Assessing the presence or absence of specific righteousness attributes. |
| Ordinal scales | Ranked categories (e.g., Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement, Deficient). |
| Interval scales | Numerical ranges with defined intervals (e.g., 0–100). |
| Weighted scales | Different criteria receive differentiated weights according to their relative importance. |
All scales shall be:
- Calibrated – with clear, operational anchors defining each point on the scale.
- Validated – demonstrated to accurately measure the righteousness attributes they purport to assess.
- Reliable – producing consistent results across different assessors and temporal contexts.
4.4 Verification Rules
Verification rules ensure the accuracy, completeness, and trustworthiness of all scoring activities. These rules shall include:
| Rule | Description |
|---|---|
| Input verification | Confirming the authenticity and completeness of all scoring inputs. |
| Process verification | Confirming that scoring methodologies are applied correctly and consistently. |
| Output verification | Confirming that computed scores accurately reflect the underlying inputs and criteria. |
| Independent verification | Requiring that scores be reviewed by qualified third parties independent of the entity being scored. |
| Audit trails | Maintaining complete, tamper-evident records of all scoring activities, including inputs, calculations, and reviewer decisions. |
4.5 Scoring Integrity Requirements
Scoring integrity constitutes the foundation of trustworthy assurance. The following integrity requirements shall be met in all scoring activities:
- Freedom from bias – scoring shall be conducted objectively, without favoritism, prejudice, or conflict of interest.
- Freedom from manipulation – scores shall not be altered, suppressed, or inflated for improper purposes.
- Transparency – scoring methodologies, inputs, and outputs shall be accessible to relevant stakeholders.
- Accountability – individuals and institutions shall be held responsible for the accuracy and integrity of their scores.
- Continuous refinement – scoring systems shall be regularly reviewed and improved to maintain their effectiveness and relevance.
5. Relationship to Other Layer 6 Components
| Component | How It Relies on 6.1 |
|---|---|
| 6.2 – People Scoring | Applies the inputs, criteria, scales, verification rules, and integrity requirements defined in this framework to individuals. |
| 6.3 – Role Scoring | Applies this framework to specific roles, using role-specific criteria derived from Layer 4A. |
| 6.4 – Domain Scoring | Applies this framework to institutional domains, using domain-specific criteria derived from Layer 4B. |
| 6.5 – Composite Scoring | Uses this framework as the foundation for aggregating and integrating multiple discrete scores. |
End of RSS 37006-6.1:2026 – Scoring Framework